The Lynnertic

Are you a Comic Con Girl?

Blogger heloise of Jezebel.com objects to the hypersexual stereotyping of women comics fans. Her rant is pretty funny:

“The Girl’s Guide To Comic Con”: Headdesk Powers, Activate!

Is it so hard, in 2009, to accept the fact that women enjoy comic books/sci-fi novels/television programs/films/video games/etc. not because of the “studs” who appear on the screen or on the page but because of the actual content? I know it may be hard for some people to believe, but women do have interests that go beyond shoes and eating poop-inducing yogurt. “The Girls Guide To Comic Con” isn’t a guide at all, but a rundown of the “hotties” who will be appearing in some form or another at the convention. Because, as the tipster who sent this article in notes (sarcastically, of course) “Oh, us GIRLZ, all we want are to look at those handsome menfolk and vampires!”

Come on, LA Times. If you really want to write a Girl’s Guide To Comic Con (and I’m not sure it’s necessary to split Comic Con into gender specific guides, but that’s another story altogether) you could have at least had women who know what they’re talking about write the piece. Like, say, the awesome ladies of io9, for example, who would probably have much more to say about the convention than “Women will be rushing the stage, offering to do star Jake Gyllenhaal’s laundry on those washboard abs that he acquired for the film, since he spends much of it fighting, shirtless or both.” Blargh.

The Girls’ Guide To Comic Con [LATimes]

My suspicion is that the Girl’s Guide to Comic Con was actually written for boys, who may be drawn to an event teeming with girls on the prowl.

It’s more likely that “a rundown of hotties” was the only way the subject could be covered as a photo slideshow in the LATimes’ Entertainment section. What else would they show photos of, Princess Leah pillow fights?