Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young: Ohio
May 18, 2007 on 10:44 pm | In Friday Protest Songs | Leave a CommentThe Friday Protest Song for May 18, 2007
Kent State University, May 4, 1970: “Right Here! Get Set! Point! Fire!”

Neil Young wrote Ohio in 1970 after seeing photographs of the Kent State massacre in Life magazine, weeks after members of the Ohio National Guard fired upon a lawful and peaceful anti-war demonstration.
Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young recorded the song live and Atlantic records rushed its release as a single. On the single’s cover was reprinted a section of the United States Bill of Rights that guarantees the right of people to peacefully assemble.
Despite being banned by AM radio at the time for its criticism of the Nixon administration, Neil Young’s condemnation and controlled rage became a call to action. Ohio explained to the country’s youth exactly what was at stake for them: not only did they need to fear being drafted and killed in Vietnam, but they had to fear for their lives at home, as well. This song helped galvanize the counter-cultural movement, and set up Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young as spokespeople for the entire boomer generation.
Guardsmen were brought to trial in 1974 and acquitted of all charges by a judge, not a jury. 37 years after the shooting, survivor Alan Canfora released a copy of a recording that he says captured an order to fire: “Right Here! Get Set! Point! Fire!”
You can listen to it yourself, here. (mp3 - you may want to save to your hard drive first).
The original reel-to-reel tape recording was made by classmate Terry Strube, who keeps it in a safe-deposit box. It is the only known uninterrupted recording of all 13 seconds of gunfire, where Guardsmen fired 67 shots upon fellow countrymen, killing four and injuring nine. Some of the students were not protesters, but caught in crossfire while walking to class.
Americans haven’t learned the lessons we should have learned from Kent State. Our police forces are still allowed to brutalize civilians with little or no ramifications. Just this month, on May 1, 2007, the Los Angeles police department “roughed up, to put it mildly” participants of a demonstration calling for immigration reform as well as the press covering the demonstration. In November 2006 UCLA guards repeatedly tasered a student (warning! this is very difficult to watch!) who refused to produce ID on command, in front of his classmates, who did little more than pull their cameraphones out to record the event. The immediate response from UCLA was to produce their policy which stated that guards had permission to taser students engaging in passive resistance. Earlier this year the City of Seattle was found guilty and penalized $1M in a class action lawsuit brought by a group of protesters victimized by police during a 1999 WTO demonstration.
It’s time to remember our rights and band together to stand up for them. Lyrics and resources are after the jump.
Half-Baked.
May 18, 2007 on 7:37 pm | In Dogma meets Karma | Leave a CommentEdward Sanchez is a former Dearborn, Michigan police officer who admitted to baking marijuana he confiscated and then stole into brownies last April. He had to, sortof: thinking he and his wife had overdosed, Sanchez called his mother-in-law, and when she wasn’t fast enough, 911, for help.
He was allowed to resign from the force without facing criminal charges.
Now, Sanchez learned his lesson, didn’t he, by losing his job, and facing what must have been some serious humiliation from his colleagues? Isn’t that enough punishment? Continue reading Half-Baked….
Are 2/4 and 4/4 time signatures just fussy ways to write the same music? No way!
May 17, 2007 on 11:56 am | In Music | Leave a CommentBy Doug Lynner
A friend of mine recently asked me to weigh in on a discussion of whether music written in 2/4 could be rewritten in 4/4 without losing anything in the translation. I believe that it cannot be with one exception noted below. The concept of “meter” is what needs to be understood in order to appreciate the difference between 2/4 and 4/4. Meter is the term that combines the concepts of measures, beats and time signatures into rhythm.
My opinion is that the only 2/4 notation that can be accurately transcribed to 4/4 is one measure of 2/4 repeated twice. There is no other possible answer unless you consider the beat/pulse and the time signature without considering the meter. The logical problem is that most people have been taught poor definitions for these terms that have confused the fine points of the lexicon. Continue reading Are 2/4 and 4/4 time signatures just fussy ways to write the same music? No way!…
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^ Powered by WordPress